Tuesday, October 8, 2013

Glioblastoma: Stem cells, plasticity and the niche(s). A summary and introduction to our R-01 submission.

I've had an interest, both clinically and scientifically, in glioblastoma for about 6 years.  This started out because I was given a project as a medical student looking at outcomes of treatment for elderly patients, but has continued and consumed more and more of my conscious and unconscious thought in the intervening years.  For a long time, patients over 70 weren't given the same care as their younger counterparts because it was felt that the treatment was too harsh for them.  This paradigm has begun to change, thanks in some part to the work I was a part of, but the outcomes remain very poor, for all patients.  While I had success in this initial clinical research (first two figs), I was frustrated at what I perceived as a lack of progress, and didn't feel that I was really contributing to this.  This feeling is really what pushed me into basic research...

Unsurprisingly, adding more therapy extends survival in the elderly.  Taken from:
Scott, J. G., Suh, J. H., Elson, P., Barnett, G. H., Vogelbaum, M. A., Peereboom, D. M., et al. (2011). Aggressive treatment is appropriate for glioblastoma multiforme patients 70 years old or older: a retrospective review of 206 cases. Neuro-oncology, 13(4), 428–436. doi:10.1093/neuonc/nor005
Anyways, my story aside, this post is supposed to be about this new research project. So, let me first provide some background. Glioblastoma is the most common primary malignancy of the brain in adults. It carries a poor prognosis of about 1.5-2 years from diagnosis - even with advanced surgery, radiation and chemotherapy.  The nature of this tumor is quite different from all others - it is incredibly invasive, with rogue cells appearing many centimeters from the primary mass.  This is different than most solid tumors, which typically have a sharp edge where the tumor stops and healthy tissue begins.  There may be some small number of cells that slip over, but usually surgeons are able to get a 'clean margin'.  This is not so in glioblastoma - even if the margin appears clean (no cells visible under the microscope), we know from prior experience that there are viable cells at quite a distance.  There is a famous surgical study from the 1930s where doctors removed THE ENTIRE HEMISPHERE of the brain in which these tumors resided, and the patients recurred on the other side (first reported by Dandy, JAMA 1928).

Recursive Partitioning Analysis showing prognostic subgroups for patients over 70.
Taken from: Scott, J. G., Bauchet, L., Fraum, T. J., Nayak, L., Cooper, A. R., Chao, S. T., et al. (2012). Recursive partitioning analysis of prognostic factors for glioblastoma patients aged 70 years or older. Cancer, 118(22), 5595–5600. doi:10.1002/cncr.27570
To combat this, we have tried treating patient's entire brains with radiation (whole brain radiation therapy), but were not able to control these distant recurrences using safe doses, and given every flavor of chemotherapy you can imagine.  Sadly, only one chemotherapy, temozolomide, has been shown to be effective, providing approximately a 6-8 week survival advantage - far from a home run.

Probably the most famous figure in all glioblastoma research - evidence that a chemotherapy significantly improved survival: by about 6 weeks.  Taken from: 
Stupp, R., Mason, W. P., Bent, M. J. V. D., Weller, M., Fisher, B., Taphoorn, M. J. B., et al. (2005). Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. The New England journal of medicine, 352(10), 987–996. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa043330

So, our standard of care is to treat where the tumor was before surgery and a smallish margin around the edges, and hoping that our chemotherapy will take care of the more distant cells.  In 2004, a famous paper from Singh and colleagues identified a small subset of cells within a glioblastoma which seemed to be responsible for these recurrences - and these cells shared many attributes of non-cancer stem cells.  It turned out that these cells were more resistant to radiation - and this gave us hope: maybe we weren't curing these patients because we were targeting the wrong cells!  The field of glioma stem cell biology has advanced rapidly and many scientists are working on the problem.  A prominent group in this field is led by Jeremy Rich at the Cleveland Clinic's Lerner Research Institute.  They have made many advances, but recently their focus has been on the effect of physical/chemical factors within the 'microenvironment' of the tumor that promote these special 'stem' cells - for example acidity, low oxygen tension and low glucose levels.

One of the scientists from this lab in Cleveland, Anita Hjelmeland, recently took a faculty position at the University of Alabama in Birmingham, where they have a massive brain tumor center (called a SPORE) to continue her work.  She and I met when I was visiting her lab in Cleveland and gave a talk about some of the theory work that +David Basanta and I have done.  She and I hit it off, scientifically, and we decided to start a collaboration.  We've worked together now on a few different projects that are in various phases of development, and just yesterday, we submitted an R-01 (a large scale, 5 year grant) proposal that is led by Anita and David, with participation from myself, +Alexander Anderson and +Heiko Enderling.  We are hoping to leverage the strengths of her biological laboratory with our theoretical modeling techniques to try to make some progress against this cancer. Her work previously has shown, convincingly, that hyoxia (low oxygen levels), acidic pH and low glucose levels promote these 'stem' cells, but trying to understand how they all work together is a difficult task - especially in a living system.  This is where our computational models can help.

Anyways, we have our fingers crossed for the success of our grant, and I'll be sure to keep you updated as to our progress.  As a teaser, I am including a figure from our grant.  Mind you, this is unpublished preliminary data (SHARING IN SCIENCE IS GOOD!), so don't draw too many conclusions from it.
Taken from: 
Heddleston, J. M., Li, Z., Mclendon, R. E., Hjelmeland, A. B., & Rich, J. N. (2009). The hypoxic microenvironment maintains glioblastoma stem cells and promotes reprogramming towards a cancer stem cell phenotype. Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 8(20), 3274–3284.

Some background: it seems that these special 'stem' cells in the tumor preferentially live in special areas called 'niches'. These niches come in (at least) two different varieties, near to the vasculature, where nutrients are abundant, and near to areas of necrosis (cell death) where nutrients are scarce. This difference is intriguing and some observations have suggested that they might contribute to differences in treatment response.  So - the preliminary finding...  our model suggests that the physical microenvironmental history of these niches is very different, and that the evolutionary dynamics within them are as well!  If we can better understand how these niches are created and maintained, maybe we can make some inroads against the progression of this tumor.

Our model, center, has two different areas in which stem cells seem to reside - near to vessels, where the environment is stable, and near to the areas of necrosis, where the environment is harsh. (unpublished data)

So - wish us luck.  The model that we have extended to make the above prediction is under review at PLoS Computational Biology, but you can see a preprint here.  Anita has published a TON of papers on this subject, which you can find on pubmed.  David has also written several papers (a couple with me) on glioblastoma, but only the preprint so far on stem cells in this disease. Our resident stem cell modeling expert, +Heiko Enderling, will be of great help as well.  You can see his long publication record on his website.

4 comments:

  1. I have come to find out that herbal medicine its the best solution to all STDs and STIs and other health related threatening issues/diseases, cause i was once tested positive for herpes and i have lived with it for about 5 years tried all form of medication all to know avail, until i get a recommendation from someone online about herbal medicine fro Dr Ofua, indeed i actually do a little/more research about the Herbalist and found out he has the possible cure to my ailment, i gave it a try by contacting him on WhatsApp messenger +2347059497969 he had the herbal medicine he sent to me and gave me dietary instructions to follows up while using the herbal medicine, he suggest that i used the medicine for a period of 21 days that after then i should go for a check up at the hospital to know the status of my herpes, which i actually did, after few weeks as recommended by him, I go for check up and behold i was now tested Negative, ever since then i have vowed to let everyone knows that herbal medicine is the solution to any diseases/infections, despite these Big pharma company trying to makes us not to use herbal medicine framing all sort of bad reviews just to diminished herbal medication for their selfish interest and big wallets purpose, my advice to you all is that try herbal medicine today and be glad that you have tried it and i assured you that if you do you will have cause to share a testimony online just am doing now, visit (https://the-great-herbal-healing-home.business.site) or email thegreatherbalhealinghome@gmaill.com to know more about the great herbalist that help me and am sure he too will help you.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hello viewers I am glad to have met with the powerful herbal healer called
    Dr voodoo who use his herbs to cure my HIV disease I suffered from 15years,
    but now I am a happy woman and i am free from this sickness that has been
    problem to my living, after using Dr voodoo herbal medicine within 1week i
    was diagnose negative, I will recommend Dr voodoo to everyone reading this
    article because this herbal healer is capable to heal anything, the
    scientist said has no cure, Email him : voodoospelltemple66@gmail.com or
    add Dr voodoo on whatsApp: +2348140120719

    ReplyDelete
  3. My name is Chersley, from USA, I want to testify of how i got cured from Herpes By Dr Ofua Ofure, I have been living with this disease for the past 11months, i have done all i can to cure this disease but all my efforts proved abortive until i met an old friend of mine who told me about a herbalist from Africa who cures several types of diseases such as hepatitis A B and C, Human Papillomavirus (HPV),Herpes and so many more. though i have doubt about it,I decided to give it a try when i contacted this herbalist,he helped me cast a healing spell and send me a herbal medicine which i make use of according to his instructions and now behold the herpes is gone and i now have my life back,If you are out there living with this disease i will like you to get cure today by Contacting this great herbalist on his email: thegreatherbalhealinghome@gmail.com
    Whatsapp: +2347059497969
    more info about his work
    visit his website on: https://dr-ofua-ofure-herbal-healing-home.business.site

    ReplyDelete
  4. I got diagnosed with herpes, I have been dealing with herpes for the past  6years. Until I got a review online about natural cure people testifying how Dr Abiola Efe  cure them with his herbal treatment. And I ordered the treatment, after taking the herbs I was totally cured. I'm recommending you diagnosis with herpes should get this treatment and be cured  you can contact his  GOOGLE { DR ABIOLA EFE }

    ReplyDelete